3-d finite element analysis (fea) simulation Search Results


90
Ansoft Corporation finite element analysis (fea) software ansoft maxwell 2d/3d
Finite Element Analysis (Fea) Software Ansoft Maxwell 2d/3d, supplied by Ansoft Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/finite element analysis (fea) software ansoft maxwell 2d/3d/product/Ansoft Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
finite element analysis (fea) software ansoft maxwell 2d/3d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Siemens AG 3d fea simulations
<t>3D</t> <t>FEA</t> simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.
3d Fea Simulations, supplied by Siemens AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d fea simulations/product/Siemens AG
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fea simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ANSYS inc 3d-ansys maxwell
<t>3D</t> <t>FEA</t> simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.
3d Ansys Maxwell, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d-ansys maxwell/product/ANSYS inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d-ansys maxwell - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d finite element analysis simulation
<t>3D</t> <t>FEA</t> simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.
3d Finite Element Analysis Simulation, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d finite element analysis simulation/product/COMSOL Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d finite element analysis simulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ANSYS inc 3d fea
<t>3D</t> <t>FEA</t> simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.
3d Fea, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d fea/product/ANSYS inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fea - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Siemens AG 3d fea simulations siemens magnet
<t>3D</t> <t>FEA</t> simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.
3d Fea Simulations Siemens Magnet, supplied by Siemens AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d fea simulations siemens magnet/product/Siemens AG
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fea simulations siemens magnet - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Abaqus Inc 3d fea simulation
( A <t>)</t> <t>3D-FEA</t> stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.
3d Fea Simulation, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d fea simulation/product/Abaqus Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fea simulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Rsoft Inc finite-element analysis (fea) simulation
( A <t>)</t> <t>3D-FEA</t> stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.
Finite Element Analysis (Fea) Simulation, supplied by Rsoft Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/finite-element analysis (fea) simulation/product/Rsoft Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
finite-element analysis (fea) simulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ANSYS inc fea simulations
Comparison of analytical solutions and <t>FEA</t> <t>simulations.</t> (a) Example 1; (b) Example 2; (c) Example 3; (d) Example 4.
Fea Simulations, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fea simulations/product/ANSYS inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fea simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d fea model
Simulated distribution of the electric field in a <t>3D</t> <t>FEA</t> model created in COMSOL. The model examines the change in the electric field's distribution in rats' liver tissue with three tumors in three different positions: ( a ) Tumors without serum (tumors that are three times more conductive than healthy tissue), ( b ) Tumors with a lower solution effect (Tumors have 1.7 times less conductive than normal tumor tissue), and ( c ) Tumors with a higher solution effect (Tumors 6.6 times less conductive than normal tumor tissue).
3d Fea Model, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d fea model/product/COMSOL Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fea model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ANSYS inc 3-d ansys finite-element analysis (fea) model
Simulated distribution of the electric field in a <t>3D</t> <t>FEA</t> model created in COMSOL. The model examines the change in the electric field's distribution in rats' liver tissue with three tumors in three different positions: ( a ) Tumors without serum (tumors that are three times more conductive than healthy tissue), ( b ) Tumors with a lower solution effect (Tumors have 1.7 times less conductive than normal tumor tissue), and ( c ) Tumors with a higher solution effect (Tumors 6.6 times less conductive than normal tumor tissue).
3 D Ansys Finite Element Analysis (Fea) Model, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3-d ansys finite-element analysis (fea) model/product/ANSYS inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3-d ansys finite-element analysis (fea) model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Ansoft Corporation finite-element analysis tool ansoft maxwell 3-d
Simulated distribution of the electric field in a <t>3D</t> <t>FEA</t> model created in COMSOL. The model examines the change in the electric field's distribution in rats' liver tissue with three tumors in three different positions: ( a ) Tumors without serum (tumors that are three times more conductive than healthy tissue), ( b ) Tumors with a lower solution effect (Tumors have 1.7 times less conductive than normal tumor tissue), and ( c ) Tumors with a higher solution effect (Tumors 6.6 times less conductive than normal tumor tissue).
Finite Element Analysis Tool Ansoft Maxwell 3 D, supplied by Ansoft Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/finite-element analysis tool ansoft maxwell 3-d/product/Ansoft Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
finite-element analysis tool ansoft maxwell 3-d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Produced

3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by non-insulated Hi-Mn steel rebars, F dg , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 200 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by non-insulated Hi-Mn steel rebars, F dg , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 200 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Produced

3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs, F dg , generated by rebars for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dg generated by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel rebars corresponding to its various operating velocities for the non-insulation and ( b ) insulation cases.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs, F dg , generated by rebars for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dg generated by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel rebars corresponding to its various operating velocities for the non-insulation and ( b ) insulation cases.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Generated

3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B for the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B for the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques:

Parameters of steel rebars for  3D FEA simulations.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: Parameters of steel rebars for 3D FEA simulations.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Permeability

3D FEA simulation results of the current densities, J , generated by AISI 1010 rebars for a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d sr of 0.27 m. ( a ) Non-insulation and ( b ) insulation rebars with the same upper bound of shaded J plot.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the current densities, J , generated by AISI 1010 rebars for a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d sr of 0.27 m. ( a ) Non-insulation and ( b ) insulation rebars with the same upper bound of shaded J plot.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Generated

3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by Hi-Mn steel tubes, F dt , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 50 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by Hi-Mn steel tubes, F dt , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 50 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Produced

3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B plot of the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B plot of the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques:

3D FEA simulation results of F d produced by tubes as well as EDS rails for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet along to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m and Δ z of 0.05 m.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of F d produced by tubes as well as EDS rails for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet along to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m and Δ z of 0.05 m.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Produced

3D FEA simulation results of the 3D half-models (Siemens MagNet) with a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d st of 0.75 m. ( a ) Shaded B plot and ( b ) shaded J plot for the AISI 1010 steel tube with EDS rails.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the 3D half-models (Siemens MagNet) with a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d st of 0.75 m. ( a ) Shaded B plot and ( b ) shaded J plot for the AISI 1010 steel tube with EDS rails.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques:

( A ) 3D-FEA stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: A robust adhesive microneedle for oral infections therapy via synergistic antibacterial and neutrophil-macrophage axis immunomodulation

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aee4401

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) 3D-FEA stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.

Article Snippet: A 3D-FEA simulation was conducted in the ABAQUS software.

Techniques: Shear, Adhesive, Fluorescence, Labeling

Comparison of analytical solutions and FEA simulations. (a) Example 1; (b) Example 2; (c) Example 3; (d) Example 4.

Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

Article Title: Fast Estimation of Strains for Cross-Beams Six-Axis Force/Torque Sensors by Mechanical Modeling

doi: 10.3390/s130506669

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of analytical solutions and FEA simulations. (a) Example 1; (b) Example 2; (c) Example 3; (d) Example 4.

Article Snippet: FEA simulations are calculated in ANSYS 11.0, while the 3-D, 20 nodes “Solid95” is chosen as the element type of FEA models for its characteristic of high tolerance with respect to irregular shapes without as much loss of accuracy [ ].

Techniques: Comparison

Simulated distribution of the electric field in a 3D FEA model created in COMSOL. The model examines the change in the electric field's distribution in rats' liver tissue with three tumors in three different positions: ( a ) Tumors without serum (tumors that are three times more conductive than healthy tissue), ( b ) Tumors with a lower solution effect (Tumors have 1.7 times less conductive than normal tumor tissue), and ( c ) Tumors with a higher solution effect (Tumors 6.6 times less conductive than normal tumor tissue).

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Preliminary evaluation of the safety and efficacy of glucose solution infusion through the hepatic artery on irreversible electroporation focusing

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33487-3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Simulated distribution of the electric field in a 3D FEA model created in COMSOL. The model examines the change in the electric field's distribution in rats' liver tissue with three tumors in three different positions: ( a ) Tumors without serum (tumors that are three times more conductive than healthy tissue), ( b ) Tumors with a lower solution effect (Tumors have 1.7 times less conductive than normal tumor tissue), and ( c ) Tumors with a higher solution effect (Tumors 6.6 times less conductive than normal tumor tissue).

Article Snippet: Figure 4 Simulated distribution of the electric field in a 3D FEA model created in COMSOL.

Techniques: